Using iMatch you are able to get EXIF analysis on how you shot over a period of time. I have analysed 2009 to see what trends are developing.
While this is not broken down into great detail, it does show that I spend most of my time at the longer end of the focal length area. This is common in sports photographers and longer lenses get you closer to the action.
This was a little surprising to me, I try to shoot really shallow, so to have f5.6 as the clear winner is interesting. I think the marathon and triathlon images (and their volume) are appearing here. I must admit, that after f2.8, f5.6 has always been my favourite aperture.
I would have thought I shot faster on average. Again I think this is the marathon and triathlon events that are mostly shot at Tv=500 for me. All the bigger stadium sports I try to shoot at 800 – 1000. At a guess I’d say all the 250th stuff is from flash work.
Lots of high ISO used here. Some justification in investing is some good ISO noise removing software. Plenty of ISO3200 which is interesting. On the MK3 this was ok, but on the older cameras it was not too crash hot. MK4 is great so I expect this to go up on average for 2010.
WOW, that’s a lot of shots. Keeping in mind that this is only the images I have on file, not the ones I deleted on camera. “Sport” cameras work more than the “Commercial” cameras. I’d like to change this in 2010, with more commercial shoots.
This one is very interesting. It’s a good demo of what you have sitting in the cupboard and never use. I have a few very expensive lenses that did not get used at all last year. No surprise the 70-200 and 400 f2.8 are at the top of the list. These are the standard lenses for a sports photographer.
It’s good to look back on 2009 and see what I’ve used and how I’ve used it. I would like to move more into commercial and advertising, but finding the time to develop that side of my business is hard.
